The emergence of China in international academic management research: A nuanced analysis following the new f²-methodology

Main Article Content

Yves Fassin

Abstract

In a few decades, China has made a huge rise in science, exemplified with an impressive expansion of academic publications. The management field has traditionally been dominated by the US universities and Anglo-Saxon researchers. The objective of the present study is to analyze through the application of a new bibliometric methodology whether the progress of Chinese universities in academic management research is in line with China’s overall progress in science. The classic analysis of volume productivity and citation count is complemented with the recent f²-methodology. It is based on a more fine-grained classification of publications into categories of citations, focusing on the 10%-percentile and the h-core. The methodology is applied here at a country level and at the level of the university, for all publications and for those of the last 5 years. The results confirm the rise of academic publications by Chinese management scholars, but the analysis of publication outlets and the international collaborations nuance this progress. The US dominance in academic management research is maintained; despite a decline in relative terms, the US publication volume and the higher citations remain in absolute terms. This application of the f²-methodology with weighted factors in function of impact brings nuances to first level bibliometric analyses based on volume productivity or on total citations. This nuanced analysis results in fairer assessments and more equitable rankings. The application of the compound F²-index illustrates the dynamics in bibliometrics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fassin, Y. (2021). The emergence of China in international academic management research: A nuanced analysis following the new f²-methodology . Malaysian Journal of Library &Amp; Information Science, 26(2), 1–21. Retrieved from https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/22378
Section
Articles

References

Fassin, Y. 2018. A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame index for academics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 69, no. 11: 1396-1399.

Fassin, Y. 2020. The compound F²-index and the compound H-index as extension of the f² and h-indexes in a dynamic perspective. Journal of Data and Information Science, Vol. 5, no. 3: 71–83.

Glänzel, W. 2001. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, Vol. 51, no. 1: 69–115.

He, T. 2009. International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, Vol. 80, no. 3: 571-582.

Hua, J., Latif, Z., Tiyan, S., Pathan, Z. H., Tunio, M. Z., Salam, S. and Ximei, L. 2018. Shift in the regional balance of power from Europe to Asia: A case study of ICT industry. Journal of Information Processing Systems, Vol. 14, no. 3: 645-654.

Kennedy, A. 2019. China’s rise as a science power: Rapid progress, emerging reforms, and the challenge of illiberal innovation. Asian Survey, Vol. 59, no 6: 1022-1043.

Lee, S. and Bozeman, B. 2005. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35, no 5: 673–702.

Li, J. and Li, Y. 2015. Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, Vol. 102, no 3: 1997-2010.

Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L. and Wang, Y. 2015. China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 9, no. 3: 555-569.

Niu, F. and Qiu, J. 2014. Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration. Scientometrics, Vol. 98 no. 2: 1221–1233.

Rezayat, F. and Sheu, M. 2020. Attitude and readiness for STEM education and careers. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 34, no. 1: 111-126.

Ribeiro, L. C., Rapini, M. S., Silva, L. A. and Albuquerque, E. M. 2018. Growth patterns of the network of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, Vol 114, no 1: 159-179.

Rousseau, R., Egghe, L. and Guns, R. 2018. Becoming metric-wise: A bibliometric guide for researchers. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.

Yang, R. 2015. Reassessing China’s higher education development: A focus on academic culture. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 16, no.4: 527-535.

Zhang, Z., Rollins, J. E. and Lipitakis, E. 2018. China’s emerging centrality in the contemporary international scientific collaboration network. Scientometrics, Vol. 116, no 2: 1075-1091.

Zhou, P. and Leydesdorff, L. 2006. The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, Vol. 35, no. 1: 83-104.

Zhou, P. and Leydesdorff, L. 2008. China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006. ISSI Newsletter, Vol. 4, no 1: 7–9.

Zhou, P. and Glänzel, W. 2010. In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82, Vol. no. 3: 597–612.

Zhou, P. 2013. The growth momentum of China in producing international scientific publications seems to have slowed down. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 49, no. 5: 1049-1051.

Zhou, P., Thijs, B., and Glänzel, W. 2009. Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, Vol. 79, no. 3: 593-621.

Zhou, Y. 2015. The rapid rise of a research nation. Nature, Vol. 528, no. 7582: S170 -S173.