INSTITUTIONAL ACTORS AND LEGISLATIVE DECISION-MAKING IN THE SECURITISATION OF CYBER THREATS IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22452//mjir.vol14no1.1Keywords:
Actors, Cyber Threats, Securitising, Policymaking, MalaysiaAbstract
This study investigates the role of key actors in Malaysia in the securitisation of cyber threats at the national level, addressing a significant gap in existing research that often overlooks the human element in cybersecurity. Correspondingly, the research employs a qualitative approach, triangulating evidence from parliamentary debates, cybersecurity policy, and legislative documents. As such, the findings highlight the contested nature of Malaysia's legislative process, where the articulation of an issue by a credible actor can transform it into a matter of national concern, prompting governmental action. At the parliamentary level, the advancement of cybersecurity-related legislation is shaped by the authority, influence, and strategic intent of the actors involved, reflecting their capacity to influence the nation's policy trajectory. In essence, cyber threats pose substantial risks to national security, often serving as instruments of hybrid warfare and thereby challenging conventional notions of state sovereignty.




