THE CRIME OF HIRABAH: APPROACH, JUSTIFICATION AND SIGNIFICANCE

Authors

  • Muhammad Hameedullah Md Asri University of Malaya, Malaysia
  • Md Khalil Ruslan University of Malaya, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22452/js.vol28no3.3

Keywords:

ḥirābah, highway robbery, restrictive approach, permissive approach, Islamic criminal law

Abstract

The punishment for ḥirābah as a ḥadd crime has been prescribed by the Lawmaker in the Qurʻān, in Chapter al-Mā’idah, 33. The provision stipulates four types of punishment, namely; execution, cutting off of hands and feet, crucifixion and banishment. Despite ḥirābah being a serious crime and the only ḥadd crime with four punishments, al-Mā’idah 33 is completely silent about the meaning of ḥirābah, its constituent elements, modes of crime and conditions. This has led the crime being approached either through a restrictive or a permissive manner by Muslim scholars. The objective of this paper is to study the concept of ḥirābah from both perspectives, their justifications and significant impacts on possible application of Islamic criminal law on the subject. This is carried out through careful examination of literature contributed by both classical and modern times. The findings of the study suggest that the restrictive approach considers ḥirābah to be a crime of highway robbery – grave theft – while the permissive approach does not stipulate any particular designation to the crime. Ḥirābah to the latter is of an unlimited crime. Their justifications range from textual to contextual analyzes, application of qiyās and other principles of Islamic jurisprudence. The significant impacts of both approaches are seen on the possible application of ḥirābah; either being a strict or a flexible form of crime, a limited or an unlimited with specified or unspecified types of punishment, involving the application of two witnesses or otherwise and the effect of repentance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘Abd al-Qādir ‘Awdah, Al-Tashrīʻ al-Jinā’ī al-Islāmī Muqāran bi al-Qānūn al-Waḍʻī, vol. 1 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Maktabah ‘Aṣriyyah, 2013).

‘Abd Allāh bin Aḥmad bin Maḥmūd bin Qudāmah, al-Mughnī, vol. 10 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī, 1983)

‘Abd Allāh bin Bayyah, ‘Islam Forbids Extremism’, http://binbayyah.net/english/islam-forbids-extremism/, accessed on 14 June 2020.

‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad al-Jabourī, Dirāsāt fi-al-Fiqh al-Jinā’ī al-Islāmī (United Arab Emirates: Dār al-Qalam, 2006).

Abū Ḥātim Ibn Ḥibbān, Saḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Maʻrifah, 2004).

Ahmad Ibrahim, ‘Suitability of the Islamic Punishments in Malaysia,’ IIUM Law Journal vol. 3/1 (1993): 6-15.

Aḥmad bin Idrīs al-Qarāfī, al-Dhakhīrah, vol. 12 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1994).

Aḥmad bin Muḥammad bin Aḥmad al-Dardīr, Aqrab al-Masālik li al-Muwaṭṭa’ Mālik (Kano, Nigeria: Maktabah Ayyūb, 2000).

Aḥmad Fatḥī Bahnasī, al-‘Uqūbah fi al-Fiqh al-Islāmī: Dirāsah Fiqhiyyah Mutaḥarrirah (Qāhirah: Maktabah Dār al-‘Arūbah, 1971).

‘Alā’ al-Dīn Abū Bakr bin Masʻūd al-Kāsānī, Baḍā’iʻ al-Ṣanā’iʻ fī Tartīb al-Sharā’iʻ, vol. 7 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1986).

‘Alī bin Muḥammad al-Māwardī, Tafsīr al-Māwardī, vol. 2 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1987).

Ammar Fadzil, ‘Death Punishment for Apostate: Classical Jurists and Contemporary Muslims’ Understanding of the Textual Provisions,’ Journal of Islam in Asia, vol. 3/1 (2006): 177-195.

Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad Jaʻfar al-Shardūb, Ḥadd al-Ḥirābah fi-al-Fiqh al-Jinā’ī al-Islāmī wa-Atharuhu fi-Istiqrār al-Mujtamaʻ (Amman, Jordan: Dār ‘Ammār, 1999).

ElSayed M.A. Amin, Reclaiming Jihad: A Qur’anic Critique of Terrorism (United Kingdom: The Islamic Foundation, 2014).

Encyclopedia Britannica, ‘North Sudanese Culture’, https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/north-sudanese-culture/north-sudanese-culture-religion, accessed on 24 September 2020.

Ḥusayn bin Masʻūd al-Baghawī, Ma‘ālim al-Tanzīl (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2002).

Ibn Rushd al-Qurṭubī, Bidāyah al-Mujtahid wa al-Nihāyah al-Muqtaṣid (Oman, Jordan: Bayt al-Afkār al-Dawliyyah, 2007).

‘Īsā al-‘Umarī and Muḥammad Shallāl al-‘Ānī, Fiqh al-‘Uqūbāt fī al-Sharīʻah al-Islāmiyyah (Amman, Jordan: Dār al-Masīrah, 2003).

Ismāʻīl bin ‘Umar, Ibn Kathīr, Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm, vol. 3 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1998).

Khalīl bin Isḥāq al-Jundī, Mukhtaṣar Khalīl (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Fikr, 1981).

Maḥmūd Aḥmad Ṭāhā, Ḥadd al-Ḥirābah fi-al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa-Atharuhu fi-Istiqrār al-Mujtama’ (Egypt: Dār al-Fikr wa-al-Qānūn).

Mālik bin Ānas, al-Mudawwanah al-Kubrā, vol. 4 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1994).

Mohamed S. El-Awa, Punishment in Islamic Law: A Comparative Study (Plainfield: American Trust Publication, 2000).

Mohammad Hashim Kamali, ‘Freedom of Religion in Islamic Law,’ Capital University Law Review, vol. 21 (1992): 63-81.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali, ‘Terrorism and Cowardly Murder,’ New Straits Times, March 10 (2015).

Mohammad Hashim Kamali, ‘Terrorism, Banditry and Hirabah: Advancing New Shariah Perspectives,’ IAIS Malaysia, vol. 8/1 (2017).

Mohammad Shabbir, Outlines of Criminal Law and Justice in Islam (Petaling Jaya, Selangor: International Law Book Services, 2002).

Mohammed Amin, ‘Sudan Repeals Death Sentence for Apostasy’, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/sudan-repeals-death-sentence-for-apostasy/1907476#:~:text=KHARTOUM%2C%20Sudan,apostasy%20was%20stoning%20to%20death and https://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/sudan-new-law-amending-penal-code-takes-effect/, accessed on 24 September 2020.

Muḥammad Abū Zahrah, al-Jarīmah wa al-‘Uqūbah fi al-Fiqh al-Islāmī, vol. 2 (Qāhirah: Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī, 1998).

Muḥammad ‘Arfah al-Dussūqī, Ḥāshiyah al-Dussūqī ‘ala al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr (Miṣr: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 2001).

Muḥammad bin ‘Abd Allāh al-‘Umayrī, Musqiṭāṭ Ḥadd al-Ḥirābah wa-Taṭbīqātuha fi al-Mamlakah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Sa‘ūdiyyah (Riyāḍ, Makkah: Nayef Academy, 1999).

Muḥammad bin Aḥmad al-Qurṭubī, al-Jāmiʻ li-Aḥkām al-Qur’ān, vol. 6 (Riyāḍ: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub, 2003).

Muḥammad bin Idrīs al-Shāfiʻī, al-Umm, vol. 7 (Manṣūrā, Egypt: Dār al-Wafā’, 2001).

Muḥammad bin ‘Īsā al-Tirmidhī, Sunan al-Tirmidhī (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār al-Fikr, 2005).

Muḥammad bin Ismāʻīl al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār Ibn Kathīr, 2002).

Muḥammad bin Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, vol. 3 (Bayrūt: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 1994).

Muḥammad bin Yūsuf, Ibn Ḥibbān, Tafsīr al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ, vol. 3 (Bayrūt, Lebanon: Dār Iḥyā’ Turāth ‘Arabī, 2002).

Muḥammad Muḥammad ‘Abd al-Ḥakīm, ‘Ḥadd al-Ḥirābah bayna al-Nazariyyah wa-al-Taṭbīq: Dirāsah Fiqhiyyah Muqāranah,’ Majallah al-Buḥūth wa-al-Dirāsāt al-Sharʻiyyah, vol. 5 (2012): 255-282.

Muḥammad Rashīd Riḍā, Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Ḥakīm 2nd ed. (Qāhirah: Dār al-Manār, 1947).

Muhammad Tahir & Abazahir Khan, ‘Penalty Provisions of Banditry between Present and Past: A Comparative Study,’ Ekta Islamika, vol. 2/2 (2014): 101-107.
Muslim bin al-Ḥajjāj, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (Riyāḍ: Dār Ṭayyibah, 2006).

Nik Rahim Nik Wajis, ‘The Crime of Hirabah in Islamic Law’ (Ph.D Thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, 1996).

Norfadhilah Mohamad Ali, ‘Piratical Activities in the Malacca Strait: The UNCLOS, Malaysian Legal Framework and the Islamic Point of View,’ Malayan Law Journal, vol. 5 (2006): cxl-clv.

Paizah Ismail, Undang-Undang Jenayah Islam (Selangor: Dewan Pustaka Islam, 1996).

Ramaḍān ‘Alī al-Sayyid al-Sharnabāṣī, al-‘Uqūbah fī al-Sharīʻah al-Islāmiyyah wa-al-Qawanīn al-Waḍʻiyyah: Dirāsah Muqāranah (Alexandria: Dār al-Maṭbūʻāt al-Jāmiʻah, 2010).

Saʻid Ibrahim, Qanun Jinayah Syar’iyyah dan Sistem Kehakiman dalam Perundangan Islam Berdasarkan Quran dan Hadith (Kuala Lumpur: Darul Ma’rifah, 1996).
Ṣāliḥ bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān al-Aṭram, Ḥadd Jarīmah al-Ḥirābah wa ‘Uqūbatuhā fi-al-Islām (n.p.: n.p., 1998).

Sayyid Abū al-Aʻlā al-Mawdūdī, Tafhīm al-Qur’ān, vol. 2 (United Kingdom: The Islamic Foundation, 1989).

Sulaymān bin Ashʻath Abū Dāwud, Sunan Abī Dāwud (Riyāḍ, Saudi Arabia: Bayt al-Afkār al-Dawliyyah, 1998).

‘Umar Muḥy al-Dīn Ḥourī, al-Jarīmah: Asbābuhā - Mukāfaḥatuhā (Damascus, Syria: Dār al-Fikr, 2003).

Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī, al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa-Adillatuh, vol. 6 (Damascus, Syria: Dār al-Fikr, 1985).

Yūsuf bin ‘Abd Allāh al-Qaradāwī, ‘al-Irhāb wa Ḥamalāt al-Karāhiyah ḍid al-‘Arab wa al-Muslimīn’, http://www.aljazeera.net/programs/religionandlife/2004/6/3/الإرهاب-وحملات-الكراهية-ضد-العرب-والمسلمين, accessed on 14 June 2020.

Zakariyyā Ibrāhīm al-Zamīlī & Kā’ināt Maḥmūd ‘Adwān, ‘al-Iʻjāz al-Tashrīʻī fi-Ḥaddai al-Sariqah wa-al-Ḥirābah,’ Majallah al-Jāmiʻah al-Islāmiyyah, vol. 14/1 (2006): 75-121.

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Md Asri, M. H., & Ruslan, M. K. (2020). THE CRIME OF HIRABAH: APPROACH, JUSTIFICATION AND SIGNIFICANCE. Jurnal Syariah, 28(3), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.22452/js.vol28no3.3