The Concept of Gender and Its Acceptability as a Category of Analysis in Economics: An Islamic Perspective

Main Article Content

Syed Redzuan Alsagoff
Asan Ali Golam Hassan
Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah


Changes in the understanding of gender are making it complicated to use gender as a category of analysis. Previously, it was generally accepted that gender is a binary category, comprising of male and female, based on clear biological distinction. Then came the idea that gender is a sociocultural construct. More recently, gender is said to be based on each person’s personal conception of himself or herself. These novel ideas have detached the meaning of gender from its biological foundation and have consequently made the concept of gender ambiguous and subjective, with theoretically infinite possible interpretations that can formulate an indeterminate number of genders. Such arbitrariness is unsuitable for scientific analysis. Accordingly, mainstream economists, in their aspiration to be scientific, have largely ignored these semantic developments and have continued to use the biologically defined binary categorisation of gender, presumably because of its practicality when used in economic analysis. From an Islamic perspective, economists are right to use such definition of gender, not because it is practical to do so, but because it conforms to reality and truth (ḥaqq) as revealed by religion. This article discusses these ideas as well as their history and interactions to show that from an Islamic perspective the number of genders is not indeterminate, nor is gender only practically binary, but it is really and truly binary in line with the worldview of Islam.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alsagoff, S. R. ., Golam Hassan, A. A. ., & Wan Abdullah, W. S. . (2021). The Concept of Gender and Its Acceptability as a Category of Analysis in Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah &Amp; Pemikiran Islam, 23(1), 167–196.


Ainsworth, Claire. “Sex Redefined”. Nature 518 (2015): 288–291.

Amnesty International UK. “Gender Identity for Beginners: A Guide to Being a Great Trans Ally”. Accessed 6th July 2020.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ABIM, 1978. Reprint, Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. On Justice and the Nature of Man: A Commentary on Sūrah al-Nisā’ (4):58 and Sūrah al-Mu’minūn (23):12-14. Kuala Lumpur: IBFIM in collaboration with Akademi Kenegaraan, 2015.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. 2nd ed. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 2001. First published in 1995.

Bakri, Zulkifli bin Mohamad al-. “Irsyad al-Fatwa Series 202: The Rulings Regarding Intersex (Disorders of Sex Development, DSD)”. (2017).

Becchio, Giandomenica, “Gender, Feminist and Heterodox Economics: Interconnections and Differences in a Historical Perspective,” Economic Alternatives, no. 1 (2018): 5-24.

Becchio, Giandomenica, “A Note on the History of Gender Economics and Feminist Economics: Not the Same Story”. In Cotemporary Global Perspectives on Gender Economics, edited by Susanne Moore. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference, 2015.

Benería, Lourdes, “Toward a Greater Integration of Gender in Economics,” World Development 23, no. 11 (1995): 1839-1850.

Benería, Lourdes, Günseli Berik, and Maria S. Floro. Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2016. First published in 2003.

Bettio, Francesca, and Verashchagina, Alina, eds. Frontiers in the Economics of Gender. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.

Bivens, Rena, and Oliver L. Haimson, “Baking Gender into Social Media Design: How Platforms Shape Categories for Users and Advertisers”, Social Media + Society (2016): 1-12.

Blau, Francine D., “Gender, Economics of”. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by James D. Wright. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015. First published in 2001.

Butler, Judith, “Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex”, Yale French Studies 72 (1986): 35-49.

Ekins, Richard, and Dave King. The Transgender Phenomenon. London: SAGE Publications, 2006.

Godman, Marion, “Gender as a Historical Kind: A Tale of Two Genders?,” Biology & Philosophy 33, no. 21 (2018),

Griffin, Lucy, Katie Clyde, Richard Byng, and Susan Bewley, “Sex, Gender and Gender Identity: A Re-evaluation of the Evidence”, BJPsych Bulletin (2020): 1-9,

Haig, David, “The Inexorable Rise of Gender and the Decline of Sex: Social Change in Academic Titles, 1945–2001”, Archives of Sexual Behavior 33, no. 2 (2004): 87-96.

Iszatt-White, Marian. “I, Leader: Becoming Human through the Emotional Grounding of Leadership Practice”. In After Leadership, edited by Brigid Carroll, Josh Firth and Suze Wilson. Routledge Studies in Leadership Research, vol. 10. New York: Routledge, 2019.

Jaroszyński, Piotr. Science in Culture, translated by Hugh McDonald. Value Inquiry Book Series, vol. 185. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi, 2007.

Khalif Muammar A. Harris and Adibah Muhtar, “Konsep Kesetaraan Gender Menurut Perspektif Islam dan Barat” [The concept of gender equality in Islam and the West], Afkār 21, no. 2 (2019): 33-74.

Marinov, Georgi K., “In Humans, Sex is Binary and Immutable,” Academic Questions 33 (2020): 279-288.

Mathis, Klaus. Efficiency Instead of Justice? Searching for the Philosophical Foundations of the Economic Analysis of Law, translated by Deborah Shannon. Law and Philosophy Library, vol. 84. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.

Merriam-Webster, accessed 5th November 2019.

Mikkola, Mari. “Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2019 ed., edited by Edward N. Zalta.

Muehlenhard, Charlene L., and Zoe D. Peterson, “Distinguishing between Sex and Gender: History, Current Conceptualizations, and Implications”, Sex Roles 64 (2011): 791-803,

Nelson, Julie A., “Sociology, Economics, and Gender: Can Knowledge of the Past Constribute to a Better Future?,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69, no. 4 (2010).

Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban, and Sandra Tzvetkova. “Working Women: Key Facts and Trends in Female Labor Force Participation”. In Our World in Data. Oxford Martin Programme on Global Development and Global Change Data Lab, 2017.

Oxford Dictionary of English. 3rd ed. Edited by Angus Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. First published in 1998.

The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Edited by C. T. Onions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.

Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2003. First published in 1973 by Little, Brown and Company.

Robeyns, Ingrid. “Esiste una metodologia economica feminista?”. In Gli studi della donne in Italia: Una guida critica, edited by Paola Di Cori and Donatella Barazetti. Rome: Carocci Editore, 2001: 119-145.

Robeyns, Ingrid, “Is There a Feminist Economic Methodology?,” 2000,

Rutherford, Donald. Routledge Dictionary of Economics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2002. First published in 1992 as the Dictionary of Economics.

Tate, Charlotte Chuck, Jay N. Ledbetter, and Cris P. Youssef, “A Two-Question Method for Assessing Gender Categories in the Social and Medical Sciences”, Journal of Sex Research 50, no. 8 (2013): 767-776,

Webb, Arielle, Emmie Matsuno, Stephanie Budge, Mira Krishnan, and Kimberly Balsam. Non-binary Gender Identities: Fact Sheet. American Psychological Association, 2015.

World Health Organization, “Gender, Equity and Human Rights,” accessed 30th January 2020,

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>