Main Article Content
In the administration and development of the Malaysian nation-state, each prime minister has contributed and exhibited his distinct leadership style. Abdul Razak Hussein and Mahathir Mohamad’s contributions and leadership, especially in the nation-state’s development and modernisation, are well-recognised by Malaysians. They referred to Razak as the Development Father while Mahathir is known as the Father of Modernisation. Their leaderships’ effectiveness is also evident in their outstanding achievements based on the policies and actions during their tenure as the nation’s leaders. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the achievement-oriented aspects of Razak-Mahathir leadership in Malaysia’s nation-state development. A qualitative historical descriptive design was used as the research methodology where the primary source of this study was the texts of the two prime ministers’ speeches. These sources are qualitatively analysed to explore the qualities of leadership they practised to develop and modernise the country. The results showed that leadership qualities such as stimulating people’s intellectual capacity, motivating people, good planning, demonstrating influence, emphasising togetherness, emphasising good values, exhibiting firmness, demonstrating self-confidence, being considerate, envisioning the future and acknowledging people’s contribution were practised by Razak and Mahathir in conducting their duties as prime ministers. It showed that a country can achieve remarkable development and modernisation when it is led by leaders who incorporate the aforementioned leadership qualities. This study’s social implications are as follows: first, underlining the importance of achievement-oriented leadership that can inspire the people and the government to foster a steady national development and secondly, implying the essential roles of leaders in defining and shaping a suitable nation-state concept that should be adopted in a nation-state. This study innovatively introduces a leadership model framework based on Razak-Mahathir’s achievements during their administration. It gives an overview of their successful leadership styles in governing the country, which can be applied or practised by leaders or related parties with similar roles, aspirations and goals.
JATI PUBLICATION ETHICS & PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT:
These guidelines are fully consistent with the COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct (https://publicationethics.org).
We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all possible principles of transparency and measures against publication malpractices. The Department of Southeast Asian Studies, as the publisher, plays its role of guardianship over all processes of publishing seriously, and we perform our ethical and other tasks.
- General duties and responsibilities of editors
Editors should be accountable for everything published in their journals. This means the editors should strive to meet the needs of readers and authors; constantly improve their journal; have processes in place to assure the quality of the material they publish; champion freedom of expression; maintain the integrity of the academic record; preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards; and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed. In addition to these general duties, the editors accept the obligation to apply best will and practice to cope with the following responsibilities:
- Editorial Board
Will generate editorial board from recognized experts in the field. The editor will provide full names and affiliations of the members and updated contact information for the editorial office on the journal webpage.
- Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
- Duties of Authors
Authors should follow the format of reporting the original research with accurate data gathered. The author should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. It is unacceptable if the author performs malpractices in the paper.
- Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have produced original articles and must appropriately cite or quote if the authors have used the work and words of others.
- Concurrent Publication
It is ethical and acceptable for an author to submit or publish the same research or manuscripts in more than one journal or primary publication.
- Acknowledging the Sources
Authors should cite properly publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
- Paper authorship
Those who have contributed significantly to the paper should be named as an author and co-authors. Those who have participated in the aspects of the research should be listed as contributors. All co-authors should have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
- Announcement and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should include the financier or grant giver if the manuscript or research is financed by the research grant or any financial support body.
- Errors in published works
The author is responsible for communicating and co-operating with the editor to retract or correct the paper when a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work.
- Publication decisions
The editor should decide which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
- Peer review process
All journal's content (articles) are subjected to a double-blind, peer-review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors and may be rejected because it is not dealing with the subject matter. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to two experts who are unknown to each other in the field of the paper.
Reviewers are asked to classify the paper as publishable, with amendments and improvements, or rejected. Reviewer's evaluations usually include what to do with the article. The author then sees the reviewer's comments.
Editors should be ready to justify any important points from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication. Editors should publish guidance to both authors and reviewers on everything expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and referred to or linked to this code.
- Fair play
The editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors' decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper's importance, originality and clarity, and the study's relevance to the journal's aim.
- Digital Archiving
The editor will ensure digital access to the journal content by the University of Malaya Journal depository section at http://jati-dseas.um.edu.my and MyJournal at http://www.myjurnal.my/public/browse-journal-view.php?id=39.
Editor and any editorial staff must keep confidential all information about the manuscript's submitted and review process to anyone except the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.
- Publication and Submission fee
Authors are freed from fees or charges for manuscript processing. Authors pay neither submission nor publication fee beyond the eventual conference registration fee (in case of conference paper is accepted for publication).
- Open Access Policy
The journal is freely available online. Authors must agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles. The articles are published under the Creative Commons copyright license policy CC-BY.
- Reporting standards
Authors of papers should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be identified as such.
- Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the authors have used the work and words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Abdullah, W. J. (2019). The Mahathir effect in Malaysia’s 2018 election: The role of credible personalities in regime transitions. Democratisation, 26(3), 521-536.
Alqahtani, K. (2020, October 19). Concept of success through transformational leader on governmental organization performance in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A multiple case study approach. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3714469
Arifin, F. M., & Othman, N. (2018). The dynamic of policymaking process in Malaysia. International Journal of West Asian Studies, 10(1), 74-84.
Baharuddin, S. A. (1990). Masyarakat Malaysia yang membangun. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Basri, A. F., Ahmad, A. H., & Aziz, A. R. (Ed.). (1987). Isu-isu perpaduan nasional: Cabaran, pencapaian & masa depan. Sintok: Sekolah Pengajian Asasi Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Beng, O. K. (2006). Mahathir as Muslim leader. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2006(1), 172-180.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Bunnell, T., Barter, P. A., & Morshidi, S. (2002). Kuala Lumpur metropolitan area: A globalising city–region. Cities, 19(5), 357-370.
Cheah, J. L. S., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017). Confucian value-based leadership communication: A study on Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 140-156.
Cheah, J. L. S., Yusof, N., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017). Tun Dr. Mahathir’s Leadership Communication: The Confucian Perspective. SHS Web of Conferences, 33. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173300060
Danto, E. A. (2008). Historical research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Embong, A. E. (2001). Negara bangsa: Proses dan perbahasan [Nation state: Processes and debates]. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.
Embong, A. R., Hassan, H., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2016). The representations of leadership by example in editorial cartoons. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 625-650.
Haggard, S. (2000). The politics of the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 130-144.
Hussin, R. (1999). Teori pergantungan dan cabaran wawasan Malaysia 2020. Jurnal Kinabalu, 5, 100-134.
Ibrahim, R. (2007). Multiculturalism and education in Malaysia. Culture and Religion, 8(2), 155-167.
Jackson, S., & Mosco, V. (1999). The political economy of new: technological spaces: Malaysia’s Multimedia Super Corridor. Journal of International Communication, 6(1), 22-40.
Jaes, L. (2017). Akal budi tempatan dalam pengurusan pembangunan oleh Soeharto, Mahathir dan Lee Kuan Yew (Ph.D. thesis), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia.
Jomo, K. S., & Sundaram, J. K. (2004). The new economic policy and interethnic relations in Malaysia. Geneva: UNRISD.
Jonas, A. E., & Wilson, D. (2018). The nation-state and the city: Introduction to a debate. Urban Geography, 39(9), 1418-1420.
Khattab, U. (2004). Wawasan 2020: Engineering a modern Malay(sia) state campaigns and minority stakes. Media Asia, 31(3), 170-177.
Lovelace, J. B., Neely, B. H., Allen, J. B., & Hunter, S. T. (2019). Charismatic, ideological, & pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership: A critical review and agenda for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 96-110.
Liu, H., Dust, S. B., Xu, M., & Ji, Y. (2021). Leader–follower risk orientation incongruence, intellectual stimulation, and creativity: A configurational approach. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 143-173.
McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117.
Mcdowell, B. (2013). Historical research: A guide for writers of dissertations, theses, articles and books. Abingdon: Routledge.
Othman, M. R. (2006). Sejarah pembinaan negara bangsa. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Mohamad, M. (1996). Islam-the misunderstood religion. JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2, 1-10.
Mohamad, M. (2012). Doktor umum: Memoir Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Petaling Jaya: MPH Group Publishing.
Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of management review, 5(4), 491-500.
Nathan, K. S. (1995). Vision 2020 and Malaysian foreign policy: Strategic evolution and the Mahathir impact. Southeast Asian Affairs, 22, 220-237.
National Archives of Malaysia. (2019, November 25). Tun Razak, catalyst of people/national development. Retrieved from http://www.arkib.gov.my/en/web/guest/tun-razak-penggerak-pembangunan-rakyat-negara
Nik Mahmud, N. A., Salleh, M., Harun, A. G. (2011). Biografi Tun Abdul Razak: Negarawan dan patriot. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Osborne, T. (2018). Treaty of Westphalia/Peace of Münster (1648). The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy, 1-9.
Raj, P., Wahab, S. A., Osman, S. I. W., Zawawi, N. M., & Fazal, S. A. (2018). Sustainable Development and Innovation: Reviewing the Concept and Malaysian Participation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1212-1226.
Rohman, M. A., & Sabri, A. Z. S. A. (2017). Kempen “Kepimpinan melalui Teladan” semasa era pemerintahan Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad di Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(2), 15-23.
Rudner, M. (1977). Education, development and change in Malaysia. Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15(1), 23-62.
Sendjaya, S., Pekerti, A., Härtel, C., Hirst, G., & Butarbutar, I. (2016). Are authentic leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between authentic leadership and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 125-139.
Suhaimy, K. A. M. (2009). Pemikiran pembangunan berteraskan system nilai budaya: Kajian terhadap pendekatan Dr. Mahathir
Mohamad 1981-1986 (Ph.D. thesis), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia.
Sundaram, J. K., & Cheek, A. S. (1988). The politics of Malaysia’s Islamic resurgence. Third World Quarterly, 10(2), 843-868.
Suppiah, S. M., Ahmad, M. K., & Gunasekaran, H. N. (2018). Mahathir’s leadership communication: Exploring the Indians’ community experience. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 205-222.
Taylor, R. D. (2003). The Malaysia experience: The multimedia super corridor. In M. Jussawalla & R.D Taylor (Eds.), Information technology parks of the Asia Pacific: Lessons for the regional digital divide (pp. 64-118). New York: M.E Sharpe.
van Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 878-891.
Welsh, B. (2005). Malaysia in 2004: Out of Mahathir’s Shadow? Asian Survey, 45(1), 153-160.